• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

dannlaw.com

Foreclosure Defense | Ohio | Chicago | New Jersey | Oregon | New York

Cleveland Office
216-373-0539
Cincinnati Office
513-951-7124
Columbus Office
877-475-8100
NY/NJ Office
201-355-3440
  • Lender Accountability
  • Foreclosure Defense
    • OH Sheriff Sale
  • Other Practice Areas
    • Loan Modification
    • Bankruptcy
      • Bankruptcy FAQs
      • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Consumer Protection
    • Student Loan Debt
  • Attorneys & Staff
    • Attorney Marc Dann
    • Managing Partners
    • DannLaw Staff
  • About
  • Law Blog
    • Attorney at Law Magazine
    • DannLaw in the News
  • Contact Us
  • CFPB Database
    • DannLaw Consumer Watch Database and Forum
    • Complaint Database
    • Hall of Shame
  • For Lawyers Only: Referral Partners
  • Forced Arbitration

PaytonDann and Manning law firms file suit alleging McDonald’s website and mobile app violate Americans with Disabilities Act, California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act

December 7, 2017 By Marc Dann

McDonalds

Lawsuit claims restaurant chain’s website and mobile app are not fully accessible to and independently usable by the blind or visually-impaired.

CHICAGO, April 25, 2017 —The Manning Law Firm of Newport Beach California has joined with former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann of the Dann Law Firm to file suit in federal court alleging that the McDonald’s restaurant chain is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (UCRA). The suit was filed because the company’s website and mobile app are not fully accessible to or independently usable by people who are blind or visually impaired. The action was filed on behalf of Sean Gorecki, a legally blind California resident who, despite numerous attempts, has been unable to access goods and services regularly offered on McDonald’s website and/or mobile app that are readily available to the non-visually impaired.

The Case, Sean Gorecki vs. McDonald’s Corporation, Case No. 1:17-cv-03036, was filed in The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division because McDonald’s is headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Among other remedies, the suit seeks a permanent injunction ordering McDonald’s to make its website and mobile app readily accessible to and usable by blind and visually-impaired individuals.

“McDonald’s could easily make the legally-required accommodations called for in the suit,” Atty. Dann said. “Every day thousands of blind and visually impaired people, including Mr. Gorecki, use screen reader software programs like Job Access With Speech (JAWS) for Windows devices or Apple’s VoiceOver to access websites and apps. But in order to function properly, the information on a website or app must be formatted so the screen reader can render it into meaningful text. Numerous companies have built that capability into their sites and apps. McDonald’s has chosen not to do so. That’s an unfortunate business decision and, we contend, a clear violation of the ADA and the UCRA.”

“The Department of Justice and case law, including National Federation of the Blind v Target Corp., establish that websites and apps belonging to private companies fall within the ADA’s accessibility requirements,” Atty. Manning noted. “The NFB v Target case is compelling because after denying wrongdoing, Target began working with the NFB to ensure that blind and visually impaired consumers had equal access to products and information on Target.com. As a result, the case was settled, Target received Gold Level NFB-NVA Certification and the company is now recognized as a leader in web accessibility.”

“The settlement was a win for the blind and visually impaired and for Target,” Manning commented. “Mr. Gorecki, I, and the other members of his legal team believe we can achieve a similar outcome in our case.”

The numerous problems Mr. Gorecki encountered when attempting to access McDonalds.com and the company’s mobile app to purchase goods and services include:

  • The home page has graphics, links, and buttons that are not labeled or are incorrectly labeled, or lack alternative text (“Alt-text”).
  • The Nutrition Calculator does not add items to the meal when a screen-reader user selects “add”, and the values for the Nutrition Calculator are not clear.
  • There are several links throughout the website that say “void (0).”
  • The menus and sub menus have redundant coding that causes screen-readers to repeatedly state “menu sub-menu.”
  • Finding a location is not fully accessible due to the structure of the headings and the constant pop-up to urge the screen-reader user to enter e-mail and zip code to sign up for the mailing list.
  • The website is structured in a confusing manner for screen-readers

“McDonald’s knows these deficiencies exist, but they’ve elected not to address them so Mr. Gorecki was left with no other recourse than to assert his rights under the ADA and the UCRA,” Dann said.

In order to address the issues and bring the company into compliance with the law, the suit asks the court to order McDonald’s to make its website and app accessible to the blind and visually impaired, regularly check the performance of both platforms, conduct end-user accessibility tests, and develop an accessibility policy as well as a process for reporting and resolving accessibility-related issues.

Filed Under: Disability Rights Tagged With: ADA Violations, California Unruh Civil Rights Act, UCRA

Primary Sidebar

Contact DannLaw

Call or contact our Law Firm for a Free Case Evaluation today.
Phones are open 24/7

Cleveland #216-373-0539

Columbus #877-475-8100

Cincinnati #513-951-7124

New Jersey/New York
#201-355-3440

Toll-free for all offices: 877-475-8100

Nosotros hablamos español. Para contactarnos, por favor llame al 877-515-5583 o haga clic aquí para enviarnos un email.

Schedule Free Consultation

Recent Posts

  • When Law Firms Face Tyranny: A Call to Lawyers from Marc Dann
  • Judge Holbrook issues stay in FPUC case
  • Plaintiffs ask Judge Holbrook to deny state’s motion for stay and enforce his February 12 ruling ordering Governor DeWine to rejoin FPUC program and secure $900,000,000 in federal benefits
  • Plaintiffs ask Tenth District Court of Appeals to order state to take all steps necessary to preserve FPUC unemployment benefits
  • In landmark decision, Judge Holbrook rules state must obtain and distribute $900,000,000 in federal FPUC funds

Categories

  • Attorneys
  • Bankruptcy
  • CFPB
  • Class Action Lawsuit
  • consumer arbitration
  • Consumer Fraud
  • Covid-19
  • cryptocurrency
  • Data Breach
  • Disability Rights
  • Evcitions
  • Foreclosure
  • Founding Partner
  • Identity Theft
  • In the News
  • Managing Partner
  • Mortgage Fraud
  • Of Counsel
  • Ohio BMV
  • Payroll Protection Program
  • private student loans
  • Property seizure
  • PUA case
  • RESPA
  • SCOTUS
  • Sheriff Sale
  • Staff Member
  • student loan debt
  • Supplemental unemployment benefits
  • The Con
  • VA home loans

Nosotros hablamos español.

Para contactarnos, por favor llame al 877-515-5583 o haga clic aquí para enviarnos un email.

Footer

Connect With Dann Law

DannLaw Cleveland OH

15000 Madison Avenue
Cleveland, Ohio 44107
Phone: 216-373-0539 or toll-free 877-475-8100

Click here for driving directions

DannLaw Columbus OH

25 North Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
Phone: Toll-free 877-475-8100

Click here for driving directions

DannLaw Cincinnati OH

220 Mill Street
Milford, Ohio 45150
Office hours by appointment in Hyde Park & Mason
Phone: 513-951-7124 or toll-free 877-475-8100

Click here for driving directions

DannLaw New York/New Jersey

825 Georges Road, Second Floor
North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902
201-355-3440 or toll-free 877-475-8100

Click here for driving directions

 

DannLaw is a Debt Relief Agency. We help people file for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.

This site is an advertisement: Legal Disclaimer. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

Privacy Policy
Web Design Agency - JSMT Media